+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 301 to 350 of 386

Thread: New Big 12 TV Deal

  1. #301
    asshat jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Furk!
    Posts
    12,455
    Mizzou won a whopping 9 conference titles in 17 seasons and play near a pro sport town where they take a decided back seat to the Cards and Rams. In what f'ed up world is that a "good piece"?

  2. #302
    Banned AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen AGGHOLE is a Model Citizen
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    450
    "It certainly strengthened us in television" is commissioner-speak for "Hey, you saw that very nice bump the Big 12 got in its post-expansion TV contract? We're going to make it look like the 47 cents in your Camry's ashtray."
    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...v-negotiations

    I see good things on the horizon...

  3. #303
    asshat TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf has a gigantic e-peen. TexasWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The scene of the crime
    Posts
    1,427
    Mizzou has good academics, and is situated near decent markets. But they are a borderline fit in the SEC.

  4. #304
    asshat MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames aka Old Freak Nasty MoJames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Durango, CO
    Posts
    3,095
    Quote Originally Posted by AGGHOLE View Post
    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...v-negotiations

    I see good things on the horizon...
    I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that you enjoy rape.

  5. #305
    Quote Originally Posted by jtk1519 View Post
    I think the ACC buyout is $20 million. Supposedly it was going to be $34 million until Clemson and FSU managed to negotiate that down to $20 million.

    If pieces start falling, don't be surprised if the Big Ten snatches up Rutgers real f'n quick. Rutgers doesn't do much for them athletically, but by adding Rutgers the Big Ten would bring the state of New Jersey and possibly the NYC TV market within the footprint of the Big Ten which means the BTN could charge those markets the much higher "home market" carriage fee. In short, adding Rutgers would add a lot of tier 3 money to the Big Ten.
    I have seen a lot of people speculate about "grabbing the NYC TV market," but let me share my insight as someone who lived in New Jersey for 11 years and still has most of my family in NJ/NY...

    NYC doesn't give a $#@! about Rutgers. (Period).

    NYC is a borderline CFB city, though there is a big collection of PSU and ND alumni in the area, which would have the biggest population of CFB fans. NYC is a professional sports town -- most of the Northeast is since the population has a) gone to smaller private colleges/universities, or b) transplants from other parts of the country. Will the people of NYC watch CFB? Sure, but it is more of a interest in who is hot/exciting now rather than any school loyalty.

    Basically, the bottom line is you can't compete with the professional sports in NYC, but if you want to get the attention of NYC's CFB fans, you get Notre Dame.

  6. #306
    asshat Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    filter this, motherfuckers
    Posts
    17,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Slikwille View Post
    I have seen a lot of people speculate about "grabbing the NYC TV market," but let me share my insight as someone who lived in New Jersey for 11 years and still has most of my family in NJ/NY...

    NYC doesn't give a $#@! about Rutgers. (Period).

    NYC is a borderline CFB city, though there is a big collection of PSU and ND alumni in the area, which would have the biggest population of CFB fans. NYC is a professional sports town -- most of the Northeast is since the population has a) gone to smaller private colleges/universities, or b) transplants from other parts of the country. Will the people of NYC watch CFB? Sure, but it is more of a interest in who is hot/exciting now rather than any school loyalty.

    Basically, the bottom line is you can't compete with the professional sports in NYC, but if you want to get the attention of NYC's CFB fans, you get Notre Dame.
    big 10 doesnt care who watches. they already have the cable/satellite contracts in place so if they add that tv market then it falls into their contract as a home market and they get paid the top rate for every subscriber in NYC market no matter how many or how few people actually watch the channel. money grab.

  7. #307
    NCSU is a UNC school, UNC regents aren't sending NCSU to some conference which UNC is not a part of.

  8. #308
    asshat jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Furk!
    Posts
    12,455
    Quote Originally Posted by Slikwille View Post
    I have seen a lot of people speculate about "grabbing the NYC TV market," but let me share my insight as someone who lived in New Jersey for 11 years and still has most of my family in NJ/NY...

    NYC doesn't give a $#@! about Rutgers. (Period).

    NYC is a borderline CFB city, though there is a big collection of PSU and ND alumni in the area, which would have the biggest population of CFB fans. NYC is a professional sports town -- most of the Northeast is since the population has a) gone to smaller private colleges/universities, or b) transplants from other parts of the country. Will the people of NYC watch CFB? Sure, but it is more of a interest in who is hot/exciting now rather than any school loyalty.

    Basically, the bottom line is you can't compete with the professional sports in NYC, but if you want to get the attention of NYC's CFB fans, you get Notre Dame.
    What you don't understand is that it doesn't matter. The BTN charges a higher carriage fee for cable providers within it's footprint (and I think if Rutgers were added, NYC would fall within that footprint). So the BTN may be available only on sport tier packages right now in the NYC market (I really don't know) but by bringing NYC into the Big Ten footprint, not only do the carriage fees increase but the BTN moves up to a more readily available tier. So it almost doesn't matter how many people in NYC actually watch the thing, the fact that the major cable providers will offer it in a more basic tier is what will generate the money.

    But ads are where the BTN gets it's money. As of '09, about 60% of the BTN's revenue came from ads. As a result, putting the BTN on basic tiers in NYC does wonders for selling ads. In fact, Frank the Tank did the numbers back in '10 and showed that of every "potential" Big Ten expansion team (keep in mind this is before corn aggy was officially added), Rutgers was second only to Texas in potential ad revenue to the BTN...


    CANDIDATES TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE

    Texas $101,369,004
    Rutgers WITH NYC $67,798,609
    Nebraska $54,487,990
    Maryland $50,818,889
    Boston College $48,382,692
    Notre Dame $47,629,255
    Kansas $46,320,092
    Missouri $45,901,459
    Syracuse $43,504,813
    Connecticut $38,080,271
    Pittsburgh $34,365,175
    Iowa State $31,831,077

    Syracuse WITH NYC $65,874,573
    http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/20...g-ten-network/

    That is why the two names you hear the most associated with further Big Ten expansion (aside from Notre Dame of course) are Rutgers and Maryland because while both schools don't offer a whole lot athletically, their revenue potential via the BTN is very large.

  9. #309
    asshat Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn aka Old Freak Nasty Tennesseehorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    That's Right, Reynolds, Burt Reynolds.
    Posts
    3,438
    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickMcHorn View Post
    The Pac 12 kept plenty of football for their networks, whereas the Big 12 is pretty much going all in. Doesn't mean much for us, as we're taken care of as long as there's a LHN, but this isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison in terms of Pac vs. Big 12.
    [AT&T Uverse subscriber]What the $#@! is that? [/AT&T Uverse subscriber]

  10. #310
    Quote Originally Posted by Lone Star View Post
    FSU, Miami, and Clemson would make fore some good baseball women's swimming too.
    fify


    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    in war terms this is akin to armored exploitation and encirclement which the germans and russians both used on the eastern front in wwII.
    I'm not so sure we want it to end like that, though.


    Quote Originally Posted by maninblack View Post

  11. #311
    asshat Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South of Kerguelen
    Posts
    6,604
    Quote Originally Posted by jtk1519 View Post
    CANDIDATES TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE

    Texas $101,369,004
    Rutgers WITH NYC $67,798,609
    Nebraska $54,487,990
    Maryland $50,818,889
    Boston College $48,382,692
    Notre Dame $47,629,255
    Kansas $46,320,092
    Missouri $45,901,459
    Syracuse $43,504,813
    Connecticut $38,080,271
    Pittsburgh $34,365,175
    Iowa State $31,831,077

    Syracuse WITH NYC $65,874,573
    incredible stuff jtk. domer is the keystone of gozer the gozarian.

    should it not read like this:

    CANDIDATES TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE

    Texas $101,369,004
    Syracuse WITH RUTGERS $65,874,573
    Rutgers WHICH TRIGGERS NEW YORK RECALC $67,798,609
    Nebraska $54,487,990 buttraw osborne already on board
    Maryland $50,818,889
    Boston College $48,382,692
    Notre Dame $47,629,255
    Kansas $46,320,092 won't have 'em?
    Missouri $45,901,459 slived
    Syracuse $43,504,813 acc 2014. for now.
    Connecticut $38,080,271
    Pittsburgh $34,365,175 acc 2014. for now.
    Iowa State $31,831,077 won't have 'em

    if domer says $#@! you delany, rutgers, maryland, BC and connecticut are the only 4 options unless syracuse and pitt reconsider their acc decision or the b1gwigs change their mind about schools they've previously turned up their nose at.
    Last edited by Hagbard Celine; 03-19-2012 at 03:17 PM.

  12. #312
    asshat Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South of Kerguelen
    Posts
    6,604
    one other thought we're forgetting.... the Magic Map requires Pitt to reconsider and turn traitor on their ACC decision just like the horny toads did. but doing so paves the way for the b1g to dump connecticut for syracuse, a no-brainer.

  13. #313
    asshat Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine aka Old Freak Nasty Hagbard Celine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South of Kerguelen
    Posts
    6,604
    Quote Originally Posted by The Missing Link View Post
    They wouldn't be close to winning:
    1) Rule of reason: Are the realigning schools self-motivated to move? Are they increasing revenue streams versus taking a hit for the sake of the conference/league?
    2) Stringency: How necessary is realignment to produce these increase revenues? I.E. is conference realignment necessary to pool media rights?
    3) Consumer harm: Are the fans of these schools harmed by the realignment?
    4) Plantiff participation: To what degree do the plantiffs participate in similar action?
    5) Exempted by law: Is the action intended to be protected by the Sports Braodcasting Act of 1961?

    A single domino loses the entire suit.
    i'm not a barrister, but the caselaw here is irrelevant. the ncaa and those in power can't afford to have 20 satellite trucks and the worldwide leader beaming daily, hourly updates from the discovery process location(s). i can come up with a winning strategy for the plaintiffs. stir the $#@!storm across the airwaves 7x24 for as long as possible. add a sprinkle of sandusky and james, and bake for one off-season with no competing news in the oven. profit.

  14. #314
    asshat jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Furk!
    Posts
    12,455
    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    one other thought we're forgetting.... the Magic Map requires Pitt to reconsider and turn traitor on their ACC decision just like the horny toads did. but doing so paves the way for the b1g to dump connecticut for syracuse, a no-brainer.
    Just take Cincy. If the magic map is right and we would get ND, FSU, etc., we just need a warm body to round out the numbers.

  15. #315
    asshat GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad aka Old Freak Nasty GhostOfTomJoad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bloom County
    Posts
    4,194
    Quote Originally Posted by thunderlounge View Post





    +rep. That's $#@!ing "my god...it's full of stars" glorious.

  16. #316
    Quote Originally Posted by thunderlounge View Post
    fify




    I'm not so sure we want it to end like that, though.




    Hell yeaz...++++

  17. #317
    asshat maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The Catalina Fucking Wine Mixer
    Posts
    12,093
    Quote Originally Posted by jtk1519 View Post
    Just take Cincy. If the magic map is right and we would get ND, FSU, etc., we just need a warm body to round out the numbers.
    Talk about aiming low. If it was the team of last resort then maybe but there's no reason to even mention cincy until everything else is exhausted and considering we've essentially pillaged the ACC I imagine Pitt and BC will be receptive to overtures especially with Notre dame in the fold. We won't need a warm body at that point.

  18. #318
    asshat maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The Catalina Fucking Wine Mixer
    Posts
    12,093
    Quote Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine View Post
    one other thought we're forgetting.... the Magic Map requires Pitt to reconsider and turn traitor on their ACC decision just like the horny toads did. but doing so paves the way for the b1g to dump connecticut for syracuse, a no-brainer.
    You know Pitt and B.C. would be falling all over themselves trying to be 16 if they knew the other 5 were coming.

  19. #319
    Sunovabitch HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09 aka Old Freak Nasty HousHorn09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    What's a Nubian?
    Posts
    4,488
    Quote Originally Posted by AGGHOLE View Post
    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...v-negotiations

    I see good things on the horizon...
    Considering the depths of your school's shortsightedness, there are no shocked faces to be found here. Moron.

  20. #320
    dipshit coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McKinney, Texas
    Posts
    54

    Big 12 targets

    Cincy's not even a Big 12 consideration at this point. The priorities are the three (or four) ACC schools, Notre Dame, of course, and at least one of Louisville, BYU, Maryland, and maybe B.C. because of its' ties to Notre Dame. Several things have to happen first for Notre Dame to get interested, as mentioned earlier in this thread. At any rate, the interest of the ACC three, Florida State, Miami, and Clemson, (...and maybe Georgia Tech.) has to be vetted first. Virginia and Virginia Tech would get consideration, but neither has shown any interest in leaving the ACC.

  21. #321
    asshat maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The Catalina Fucking Wine Mixer
    Posts
    12,093
    The sec isn't in a bad position but they didn't do themselves any favors adding mizzou and A&M. In retrospect it actually be benefitted the big 12. Now the big 12 has great flexibility while the sec has little. Aggy will continue to pat themselves on the back but in reality they did us and the remaining schools a huge favor. Thx little bro.

  22. #322
    asshat jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519 aka Old Freak Nasty jtk1519's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Furk!
    Posts
    12,455
    I just threw out Cincy as a name. If we have already picked up ND, Clemson, FSU and maybe Miami, what difference does it make? Pitt? Please. Cuse? Please. All are fine, none are worth breaking a sweat for.

  23. #323
    asshat maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The Catalina Fucking Wine Mixer
    Posts
    12,093
    Probably none but cincy is small potatoes and should be considered after others.

  24. #324
    Quote Originally Posted by maninblack View Post
    Probably none but cincy is small potatoes and should be considered after others.
    ND should just have their choice if it comes down to Cincy. Let them have BC, or get to work on Navy again if that's who they want.

  25. #325
    $#@! the dumb $#@!. Let's steal $#@!ing Florida to go along with FSU, Miami and Clemson.

  26. #326
    dipshit coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn can play the whole course with a 4 iron. coolhorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McKinney, Texas
    Posts
    54

    Interesting thought

    The ACC may wind up suspiciously looking like the Big (L)east once the Big 12, and perhaps the SEC and B1G grab current ACC members. The ACC will have to go back and raid the Big (L)east some more just to get up to ten or twelve teams, but at least, they'll still be a basketball powerhouse. I figure that right now, Florida State, Miami, Clemson, perhaps Georgia Tech, perhaps Maryland, and perhaps BC are in play to some degree. You figure UNC, Duke, NC State, Wake Forest, Virginia, and Virginia Tech are all pretty solid to the ACC, and Pitt and the 'Cuse are too new to the conference to be looking at their options yet. The Big (L)east will be raiding the MAC to get back to even C-USA's level.

  27. #327
    Quote Originally Posted by Slikwille View Post
    I have seen a lot of people speculate about "grabbing the NYC TV market," but let me share my insight as someone who lived in New Jersey for 11 years and still has most of my family in NJ/NY...

    NYC doesn't give a $#@! about Rutgers. (Period).

    NYC is a borderline CFB city, though there is a big collection of PSU and ND alumni in the area, which would have the biggest population of CFB fans. NYC is a professional sports town -- most of the Northeast is since the population has a) gone to smaller private colleges/universities, or b) transplants from other parts of the country. Will the people of NYC watch CFB? Sure, but it is more of a interest in who is hot/exciting now rather than any school loyalty.

    Basically, the bottom line is you can't compete with the professional sports in NYC, but if you want to get the attention of NYC's CFB fans, you get Notre Dame.
    NYC nearly always gets Big 10 games in regional coverage splits anyways. They don't need Rutgers to dominate the market. However, Rutgers did have a bump in NYC coverage the Ray Rice years. They could certainly capture the market if they could put a steadily decent product on the field. And there are more Rutgers alums in the NYC area than ND or PSU, probably combined. They just aren't going to give a $#@! until the team has sustained success.

  28. #328
    asshat The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    6,052
    If Notre Dame were to join a conference, wouldn't USC immediately become a part of the discussion as well? How happy is USC splitting revenue with all the crappy teams out west?

  29. #329
    Quote Originally Posted by The Missing Link View Post
    If Notre Dame were to join a conference, wouldn't USC immediately become a part of the discussion as well? How happy is USC splitting revenue with all the crappy teams out west?
    Very happy.

  30. #330
    Quote Originally Posted by The Missing Link View Post
    If Notre Dame were to join a conference, wouldn't USC immediately become a part of the discussion as well? How happy is USC splitting revenue with all the crappy teams out west?
    I believe all PAC schools gave a complete grant of television rights to the conference, which means if they left they wouldn't make any tv money until that grant of rights expired. So, not likely. BIG is the same.

  31. #331
    asshat The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    6,052
    Quote Originally Posted by conVINCEd View Post
    I believe all PAC schools gave a complete grant of television rights to the conference, which means if they left they wouldn't make any tv money until that grant of rights expired. So, not likely. BIG is the same.
    Usually breaching a contract involves breaching the contract. You mean it is part of the buyout to buy back TV rights?
    Last edited by The Missing Link; 03-20-2012 at 10:47 AM.

  32. #332
    Quote Originally Posted by The Missing Link View Post
    Usually breaching a contract involves breaching the contract. You mean it is part of the buyout to buy back TV rights?
    Not a lawyer, but my understanding is that it would be next to impossible for a school to leave the BIG or PAC.

  33. #333
    Quote Originally Posted by conVINCEd View Post
    Not a lawyer, but my understanding is that it would be next to impossible for a school to leave the BIG or PAC.
    Me too. Breach away, but you've got nothing to offer your new conference except upgraded games as a visiting opponent.

  34. #334
    asshat maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack aka Old Freak Nasty maninblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The Catalina Fucking Wine Mixer
    Posts
    12,093
    Quote Originally Posted by coolhorn View Post
    Pitt and the 'Cuse are too new to the conference to be looking at their options yet. The Big (L)east will be raiding the MAC to get back to even C-USA's level.
    Enjoyed your posts but I don't necessarily believe this if it turns into a free for all. Obviously TCU jumped ship early so the precedent is there. Survival will be key. Should be fun to watch.

  35. #335
    You guys might find this $#@! intereasting..

    From the Sports Business Journal

    The Big 12’s pending media rights extension with ESPN is being patterned after the Pac-12’s TV rights deal, sources told SportsBusiness Journal last week.

    That’s because the deal, which still is weeks away from being signed, is expected to have ESPN and Fox Sports sharing some broadcast and cable programming rights, like they do in the new agreement with the Pac-12. Currently, ESPN holds the broadcast rights for Big 12 games, and Fox Sports holds the cable rights for football.

    The Big 12’s extension with ESPN would take the league’s partnership with the network to 2025. The two contracts combined would run concurrently for 13 more years and pay the conference a total of $2.5 billion. The breakdown works out to roughly $1.3 billion from ESPN and $1.2 billion from Fox.

    Fox could pick up the rights to some Big 12 football games for its broadcast channel, while ESPN could wind up with cable rights that it could use for its channels.
    Photo by: GETTY IMAGES
    If the new deal goes through as expected, Fox could pick up the rights to some football games for its broadcast channel, while ESPN could wind up with cable rights that it would use for its channels. One of the ESPN channels that could benefit is Longhorn Network, which thus far has been unable to cut carriage deals with the biggest cable operators and satellite companies in Texas.

    A working relationship between ESPN and Fox is far from unprecedented. The two networks joined forces last year to negotiate a record $3 billion, 12-year deal with the Pac-12, which made them joint rights holders for the first time.

    “It’s beyond two major networks. It’s really two major media companies with lots of networks and lots of platforms and a vast array of marketing assets,” said Chris Bevilacqua, the media consultant for the Pac-12 who engineered that conference’s joint deal with ESPN and Fox. “It’s terrific if you’re the property rights holder. Both networks have proved to be great producers, distributors and marketers, and they have significant investments in college sports. Between the two of them, it’s good for the overall industry to have all the assets of two of the biggest media companies in the world investing into your product.”

    The pending deal also keeps competitor NBC Sports from gaining a foothold in the college sports marketplace. When they completed their Pac-12 deal, ESPN and Fox Sports executives were open about their willingness to partner in order to keep NBC Sports from getting the conference’s games.

    If the Big 12 deal is signed, it will have the same effect.

    The Big 12’s current contract with ESPN has four years left on it, but both sides didn’t want to wait it out. The conference, which has endured the upheaval of four schools leaving and two new schools joining in the last two years, looks forward to securing its financial future after it appeared that the conference might crumble. Nebraska left for the Big Ten and Colorado joined the Pac-12 last year, and this year Texas A&M and Missouri are heading to the SEC, moves which left the conference on the verge of folding.

    Instead, the Big 12 added Texas Christian and West Virginia to hold steady at 10 teams.

    How a new media contract would affect the conference’s willingness to expand remains to be seen, but industry analysts said the Big 12 would be less likely to add more teams now that it has its primary revenue stream secured for the next 13 years.

    The conference stands to make $2.5 billion over the next 13 years combined from both networks, which averages $192.3 million a year, or $19.23 million annually per school. That puts the Big 12 in the same range with the Pac-12 and the Big Ten, both of which make close to $21 million a year for their schools through media deals.

    The Pac-12 money is about to jump when its conference networks come online later this year.

    Big 12 schools also have the potential to generate additional revenue because each one keeps the rights to at least one football game and multiple basketball games that they can monetize. For Texas, those games go on Longhorn Network, while other schools broadcast them online or on TV through syndication or pay-per-view.

    The SEC’s current deal with ESPN annually pays its schools about $17 million each, while the ACC is at $13 million per school, but both conferences are in the midst of negotiating raises to account for expansion. The ACC is adding Syracuse and Pittsburgh.

    Extending the Big 12’s deal not only secures the conference’s financial future, it should make its schools think twice before jumping to other leagues. The deal also would lock ESPN into a long-term partnership with the league and prevent the Big 12 from taking its rights to the open market, two aspects to the deal that carry significant value, industry sources say.

    Others, however, have wondered why the conference would rush into a deal now. Chuck Neinas, the Big 12’s interim commissioner, is expected to be in office for three more months until a permanent replacement is hired, which has prompted industry experts to wonder why the conference would move forward in its talks with ESPN instead of waiting until a permanent commissioner is hired. Big 12 officials would not comment.

    Doing its extension with ESPN now also might rob the conference of some important negotiating power. ESPN’s contract talks with the SEC and ACC could reset the market again if those numbers jump and meet or surpass Pac-12 money.

    On the other hand, the Big 12 can rest somewhat easier knowing that it has gone from the verge of extinction to solid footing for the next 13 years.

    The college marketplace promises to be busy this year. In addition to the talks between ESPN and the SEC and ACC, the Big East will be in the market for a new contract as well. The Mountain West and Conference USA also are in the process of determining how they could merge their two leagues, and that too could present the opportunity to renegotiate their media contracts.
    It is worth heading to the link just to see the tables with the contract figures on them

  36. #336
    $#@! it.. I know the shag is lazy

    Current college television deals CONFERENCE TERMS CONTRACT YEARS NETWORK(S) DEAL SIGNED

    BIG TEN $1 billion/10 years 2007-2008 through 2016-17 ESPN/ABC June 2006 $72 million*/6 years 2011-12 through 2016-17 CBS June 2011 $2.8 billion/25 years 2007-2008 through 2031-32 Big Ten Network August 2006 Notes: With the addition last year of former Big 12 member Nebraska, there are 12 schools in the Big Ten. Big Ten Network debuted in 2007. The conference and News Corp. jointly own the network and share expenses.


    BIG EAST $200 million/6 years 2007-2008 through 2012-13 ESPN/ABC August 2006 Note: Pitt and Syracuse will be moving to the ACC, and West Virginia is leaving to join the Big 12. In response, the Big East will add Boise State, Central Florida, Houston, Memphis, Navy, San Diego State, Southern Methodist and Temple.


    SEC $2.25 billion/15 years 2009-10 through 2023-24 ESPN/ABC August 2008 $825 million/15 years 2009-10 through 2023-24 CBS College Sports August 2008 Note: Missouri and Texas A&M will join the conference later this year, giving it 14 members.


    ACC $1.86 billion/12 years 2011-12 through 2022-23 ESPN/ABC, ACC Network/Raycom May 2010 Note: Pitt and Syracuse will join the ACC, giving it 14 members.

    BIG 12 $1.17 billion/13 years 2012-13 through 2024-25 Fox March 2011 $1.3 billion/13 years 2012-13 through 2024-25 ESPN/ABC March 2012 $78 million/4 years 2008-09 through 2011-12 FSN April 2007 Note: Last year the conference lost Colorado and Nebraska, reducing it to 10 members, and this year it will lose Missouri and Texas A&M to the SEC. In response, it has added Texas Christian and West Virginia, keeping it at 10 members.


    PAC-12 $3 billion/12 years 2011-12 through 2022-23 ESPN and Fox May 2011 Note: Former Big 12 member Colorado and former Mountain West member Utah became the 11th and 12th members of the conference last year. * Basketball only Sources: Conference Form 990s filed with the IRS; conference officials

  37. #337
    asshat The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    6,052
    From SBJ figures, here's the adjusted annual value of the media rights in 2012 dollars, with 3% inflation assumed:

    PAC: $17.9MM
    B12: $15.9MM
    B1G: $15.9MM
    SEC: $12.5MM ~$14.5MM estimated after negotiations
    ACC: $9.6MM ~$11.1MM estimated after negotiations
    BE: $2.6MM ~$4.2M estimated after negotiations

    I'm not sure how to treat B12's expiring FSN contract - whether the new ABC contract will assume those rights or if they will be renegotiated later. It is excluded, but potentially bumps us up to $17.9MM.

    The SEC needs $2.5BB over 12 years to get a comparable deal (up from ~$1.8BB)
    Last edited by The Missing Link; 03-20-2012 at 12:10 PM.

  38. #338
    asshat Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death aka Old Freak Nasty Duck of Death's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    filter this, motherfuckers
    Posts
    17,673
    but the big 12 is an "on your own for tier 3" conference whereas the pac and shortly the sec will have a conference network to negotiate tier 3 as a group

  39. #339
    asshat The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    6,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Duck of Death View Post
    but the big 12 is an "on your own for tier 3" conference whereas the pac and shortly the sec will have a conference network to negotiate tier 3 as a group
    If the B1G network is an indicator...on-your-own Tier 3 might be better for most teams. If you assume the B1G could get a comparable 2nd-tier deal as the B12, then their network is only paying ~$2.7M for Tier 3.
    Last edited by The Missing Link; 03-20-2012 at 12:23 PM.

  40. #340
    Quote Originally Posted by The Missing Link View Post
    If the B1G network is an indicator...on-your-own Tier 3 might be better for most teams. If you assume the B1G could get a comparable 2nd-tier deal as the B12, then their network is only paying ~$2.7M for Tier 3.
    That's interesting. I've never really looked at the specifics of it. Ignoring other sports, their ABC contract is for up to 41 football games. The Big 12's Fox and current ESPN contracts are for up to 59 (19 from ESPN; 40 from Fox).

    The B1G Network averages 3 football games per team, just under 9 basketball games per team, then all the other BS.

    When the LHN was announced, it was for one football game, and 8 basketball games.

    In the end, the B1G has a larger 3rd tier package, and is making a fair amount less than Texas, well before our 70% rule kicks in.

  41. #341
    asshat The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link should starts The Missing Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    6,052
    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickMcHorn View Post
    That's interesting. I've never really looked at the specifics of it. Ignoring other sports, their ABC contract is for up to 41 football games. The Big 12's Fox and current ESPN contracts are for up to 59 (19 from ESPN; 40 from Fox).

    The B1G Network averages 3 football games per team, just under 9 basketball games per team, then all the other BS.

    When the LHN was announced, it was for one football game, and 8 basketball games.

    In the end, the B1G has a larger 3rd tier package, and is making a fair amount less than Texas, well before our 70% rule kicks in.
    That's kinda the kicker to this whole discussion. It is hard to compare media rights apples-to-apples because the contracts aren't equal. And most top programs are able to nickel-and-dime a couple millon off of the leftovers.

  42. #342
    Quote Originally Posted by jtk1519 View Post
    What you don't understand is that it doesn't matter. The BTN charges a higher carriage fee for cable providers within it's footprint (and I think if Rutgers were added, NYC would fall within that footprint). So the BTN may be available only on sport tier packages right now in the NYC market (I really don't know) but by bringing NYC into the Big Ten footprint, not only do the carriage fees increase but the BTN moves up to a more readily available tier. So it almost doesn't matter how many people in NYC actually watch the thing, the fact that the major cable providers will offer it in a more basic tier is what will generate the money.

    But ads are where the BTN gets it's money. As of '09, about 60% of the BTN's revenue came from ads. As a result, putting the BTN on basic tiers in NYC does wonders for selling ads. In fact, Frank the Tank did the numbers back in '10 and showed that of every "potential" Big Ten expansion team (keep in mind this is before corn aggy was officially added), Rutgers was second only to Texas in potential ad revenue to the BTN...


    CANDIDATES TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE

    Texas $101,369,004
    Rutgers WITH NYC $67,798,609
    Nebraska $54,487,990
    Maryland $50,818,889
    Boston College $48,382,692
    Notre Dame $47,629,255
    Kansas $46,320,092
    Missouri $45,901,459
    Syracuse $43,504,813
    Connecticut $38,080,271
    Pittsburgh $34,365,175
    Iowa State $31,831,077

    Syracuse WITH NYC $65,874,573
    http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/20...g-ten-network/

    That is why the two names you hear the most associated with further Big Ten expansion (aside from Notre Dame of course) are Rutgers and Maryland because while both schools don't offer a whole lot athletically, their revenue potential via the BTN is very large.




    Huge...tracts of land!

  43. #343
    asshat BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SW Austin
    Posts
    5,037
    I personally don't want to go to 16 teams. I am afraid that 16 is going to not work. Let's let the SEC (at 14 already) figure that out. Even with the Pod System, it just becomes a loose affiliation of teams. I'm afraid that 16 is so big that it collapses upon itself. The SEC is likely going to at some point end their cross-over game which ends many years of tradition with games like Alabama/Tennessee and Auburn/UGa ending. And for what? To say they have the richest tv deal? I guess so. Slive, a few years ago, said that the biggest threat he saw to the SEC was from within and I think he's pulling his own trigger. Adding Mizzou, culturally, makes no sense but it had to be done to get to the 14 round #.

    That said, I do think the Big12 needs to get back to 12. Where the other 2 come from.........

  44. #344
    asshat randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles should starts randomscribbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    not going away
    Posts
    2,746
    Quote Originally Posted by BearLakeHorn View Post
    I personally don't want to go to 16 teams. I am afraid that 16 is going to not work. Let's let the SEC (at 14 already) figure that out. Even with the Pod System, it just becomes a loose affiliation of teams. I'm afraid that 16 is so big that it collapses upon itself. The SEC is likely going to at some point end their cross-over game which ends many years of tradition with games like Alabama/Tennessee and Auburn/UGa ending. And for what? To say they have the richest tv deal? I guess so. Slive, a few years ago, said that the biggest threat he saw to the SEC was from within and I think he's pulling his own trigger. Adding Mizzou, culturally, makes no sense but it had to be done to get to the 14 round #.

    That said, I do think the Big12 needs to get back to 12. Where the other 2 come from.........
    I'm of the complete opposite opinion, personally. Stay at ten or expand to a full sixteen. Ten teams keeps the most unity, the clearest road to a championship, and still makes a ton of money.

    Any more than that and we have the Big 12 north issues all over again, both in terms of unbalanced championship games and not having a real rivalry with any of the teams from the other division. 12 has that problem; 14 makes it even worse (if you add a cross division rival like the SEC, you play the other six schools every six years). 16 changes things with a shift to pods. The focus becomes on the fight with your podmates, and since that's only three games out of eight or nine, you still have a lot of space to play all the other schools much more regularly.

    And if we go with a rotating division style pod setup, it puts us in the same division as all other teams once every three years, giving us incentive to root for and against teams during games we wouldn't have any standings-based reason to care about otherwise. Clemson-FSU would be a good watch regardless, but if it their records directly impact our ability to make it to the championship game, we will care a lot more.

    Aside from a setup like that, there are few ways that we can grow past ten and still have us care about schools like WVU any more than we cared about Mizzou before. Plus the Big 12 east division would be ugly as $#@!. Iowa State in the same division as Miami? No thank you.
    Last edited by randomscribbles; 03-21-2012 at 01:15 PM.

  45. #345
    dead from aggy misery od Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL aka Old Freak Nasty Ghost of LL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    They Tried to Make Me Go to Aggy Misery Rehab . . .
    Posts
    15,660
    Quote Originally Posted by randomscribbles View Post
    I'm of the complete opposite opinion, personally. Stay at ten or expand to a full sixteen.
    I am in complete agreement with you largely for the reasons you enumerate.

  46. #346
    asshat BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn should starts BearLakeHorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SW Austin
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by randomscribbles View Post
    I'm of the complete opposite opinion, personally. Stay at ten or expand to a full sixteen. Ten teams keeps the most unity, the clearest road to a championship, and still makes a ton of money.

    Any more than that and we have the Big 12 north issues all over again, both in terms of unbalanced championship games and not having a real rivalry with any of the teams from the other division.
    I prefer 10 over 16 but the only problem with 10 (and it's a big problem) is the perception that it is weak.

    I think that the issues with the Big12 were not due to the way it is designed as much as the individual schools that left had other agendas. 1) Nebraska was not happy that the conference went from being situated in KC to Dallas and the league became a TX centric league. 2) CU thought that the music was stopping and went for a quick payout fearing no safe landing. 3) A&M is A&M. 4) Mizzou, not really sure.

    But if you look at the 12 member SEC they never had any problems with scheduling or what you mention above. I do think that if we go to 12 teams, a cross-over game does make sense. I had said that years ago, OU should have had Nebraska as a cross-over rival, I would have liked CU, A&M KSU, Baylor Iowa St., OSU Kansas, Tech Mizzou... something like that. It helps give you 1 rival in the opposite division. The way the SEC is going, they either need a 9 team conf. schedule to maintain the cross-over or they won't play each other in opposite divisions in almost decades.

  47. #347
    dipshit XOVERX can play the whole course with a 4 iron. XOVERX can play the whole course with a 4 iron. XOVERX can play the whole course with a 4 iron.
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    74
    Of the schools I think there might be a shot of adding, here's my Big 16:

    Northeast Pod 1 “Yankee”: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Rutgers, Iowa State
    Southeast Pod 2 “Dixie”: Florida State, Miami, Clemson, Maryland
    Northwest Pod 3 “Plains”: Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, Texas Tech
    Southwest Pod 4 “Red River”: Texas, Oklahoma, Texas Christian, Oklahoma State

    I cannot let go of the northeastern corridor if it's there.

  48. #348
    Northeast Pod 1 “Yankee”: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Rutgers, Iowa State
    Southeast Pod 2 “Dixie”: Florida State, Miami, Clemson, Maryland
    Northwest Pod 3 “Plains”: Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
    Southwest Pod 4 “Lone Star": Texas, Texas Christian, Texas Tech

    1.) 9 game conference schedules with 3 in pod, 3 against the other pod that makes up your division and every team has 1 annual cross over game within each pod, that could be the carrot that gets ND on board. They could have annual games with Texas, OU and Miami or FSU if they so choose

    2.) Divisions change every two years so the even the have-nots like KSU, KU, and ISU can say they will play games in Texas and FL every four years. This will help avoid the unbalance like the run the Big12 South had over the North in the last years of the 12 team Big 12 and will help integrate the teams.

    For example, every year UT would play TT, TCU and BU (pod games) OU, ND and FSU (annual cross over rivalries) and then add in 3 games versus which ever pod was up in the rotation. Getting OU out your pod would allow for the possibility of a UT-OU conference champ games but continue the greatness that is the RRS at the Fair.

  49. #349
    ^^ You just kicking Baylor our, or what?

  50. #350
    Oops, I forgot to retype Baylor when switching up the pods from XOVERX's originals, will edit

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Home .. Advertise .. ShaggyShop .. PanchoChat
Football .. Basketball .. Baseball .. Other Sports .. RC Didn't Offer .. Gamboool
Varsity .. Hole in the Wall .. PCL .. Einstein's .. Nasty's .. GM Steakhouse .. NSAA
Bada Bing .. Can you help me with this? .. Shagslist .. Cloak Room .. Classics .. Bellmont