better the $#@! you know, or so goes the old saying...
Anyone else find it funny that MeSoHorny is going on about how his wife is taking care of business.
Currently browsing from the can using crapatalk
Somewhat Relevant (Gilbert Gottfried reads 50 Shades of Grey)
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c82_1337349279
No worries... it's not like the ShaggySearchEngine would've helped you, though... it's done broke.
I can't believe you guys are naive enough to believe that polygamy is impossible or that no woman may agree to it.
Dr Victoria Zdrok is on record in claiming all marriages should be open, of course it does not hurt that she is a looker, which is also part of the point, the more insecure the woman is the more likely she is to be militant with regards to monogamy. I don't blame them though as long as men keep worshiping youth.
Are you $#@!ing serious w/ this?
Let me help you out . . . people are making fun of you not because they can't imagine that some women agree w/ polygamy. They are laughing at you because of the way you come off. You couldn't sound more ridiculous ( "looker"? ). You sound like some level 85 warlock, pumped full of testosterone after soloing some mega hard WoW boss, that descended upon this thread and derisively mocked everyone here, because you've got 3 different girls you met on WoW just waiting to suck your $#@! whenever you instruct them, because you are some type of "alpha".
Not to be too brutal here, but that post is pathetic. Like the guy that has no social life instructing the ignorant masses on what life is REALLY like.
Shaggy wimmenz expurtz
![]()
Did Linux seriously just reference a former Playmate as a source on anything of substance?
Why does this matter? She views human sexuality academically and that is enough for me to pay attention, I disagree with stuff she says but it is not your typical bimbo as she can at least cite studies.Did Linux seriously just reference a former Playmate as a source on anything of substance?
As for DFW Read and learn guys read and learn (obviously I am not this guy)
http://www.reddit.com/r/askseddit/co..._you_guys_are/
There are a ton of inner language anacronyms but I will start with just this.
PUA == pick up artists
I feel sorry for people that are so hung up over social conservatism, unwilling to believe that there is a world out there filled with attractive women that are not prissy little housewives, with multiple boyfriends and sugar daddies.
You belittle my social life but you yourself had no idea this world even existed, and not giving a $#@! about your woman $#@!ing other men is the first mental door one has to cross (it actually turns me on), because you really need polygamy to stay on your game, you need to practice a lot (I can not stress this enough you need practice, even a few months off makes you rusty). Also a permanent condom policy, maybe vasectomy.
I can cold open a conversation with ANY woman in the world in any setting (gym, beach, mall,night) it does not mean that I am the most desirable man in the world or even remotely close to it, BUT I can at least start a conversation pickup with the hottest of the hot, I have been rejected a lot (and I mean a $#@!ing lotttt) but its called the numbers or percentage gaming, I am actually prouder of my rejection record, just like I am proud about being this board's lighting rod (aka Zeus). It has nothing to do with the basement nerd stereotypical glasses look, but with your mind. Be lucky we are men, you can change your life tomorrow if you bothered to care. Women have to change their body to attract higher value.
Just browse www.reddit.com/r/seduction or www.fastseduction.com forums, if you think I am bullshitting you. There is a whole industry revolving around this, and if anything at worse it can teach you about your inner self, that is in self-improvement.
Be your best, NOT be yourself. That is all an alpha male is, in-your-head not feeling down if you screw up. Even if you are happily married and remain monogamous this can vastly improve your life (or at least I think).
Oh, this just keeps getting better and better.
The reason y'all are having trouble accepting linux's revelatory insights about "polygamy" is that you've failed to realize that he's actually Zeus.
I thought this thread had peaked.
I was wrong.
Please continue.
Cool story bro...
A girl I had given up on a few months ago called me out of the blue to go to Movies in the Park. I agreed and went. She paid for food and parking. Went back to her place afterwards. Saw the book on her coffee table and asked her about it, though I knew full well what it's about.Le sex was made.
linux, you do realize that your first link is a woman asking how to get her hookup to settle down with her because she has fallen in love and doesn't want to share him anymore, right?
Regardless, mega lulz at citing this guy as your proof:
![]()
I cannot find the thread because search sucks, but there was a thread on Bada Bing where I argued the same that most women IN THE LONG RUN might object to polygamy for logical biological reasons (or in reality men always seeking female youth). That said you are a fool if you think ALL 20 year olds object to it, hell the more attractive they are the more likely they are to have multiple partners herself and if you object to it you won't be one of them. Society sluts shames them, and people object that she is a just a fancy prostitute because they buy her gifts. Me? I just want to $#@! her if I am lucky, I won't buy her anything though, nor fall in love, just do the same that she does.
If you are sufficiently emotionally supportive and if you really do care it is possible to have an open marriage, you just have to find the 1 in a 1000 woman that is all. Of course I have no idea how you would be able to do this, that is why I always say it is possible, just very difficult. The girl in the OP linked is probably considering being one.
BTW I wish I was as good as Mystery, but the whole PUA industry is a scam they cannot really train you to be as good as they are, and women are catching up to the best techniques. My advice is just be your best, be confident by approaching-all-the-time rejection really just slides off, I got rejected twice at the mall yesterday by the hottest girls I could find, did the world end? hardly, did anything objectively negative at all happen? no. I approach it like Baseball, where with every single approach there are no strikes, just foul balls. foul ball? you move on to the next girls.
Last edited by linux; 06-03-2012 at 08:44 AM.
Of course nobody thinks polygamy is impossible. The fact that there are actual polygamists in various parts of the country is pretty rock solid proof of that.
As for the whole PUA angle, nobody is doubting that it's possible to pick up women at bars and sleep around. But I'm not really sure how a PUA tangent fits into an argument about polygamy. I'm no expert on the PUA community, but I'm pretty sure the primary goal of those guys isn't to settle down with 5 wives on a dairy farm in Utah or some $#@! like that.
Anyway, you posit in your own post that only 1 in a 1000 women would go for an open marriage even under the best case scenario. Perhaps - and I'm just throwing this out there - maybe exploring the whole polygamy route would typically be a rather large misstep in a relationship, even for a man armed with the gifts of self-confidence and cheesy romance novels.
Hey, I just had an idea. Would it be possible to organize a Shaggy literary salon with Dr. Victoria Zdrok and Mystery as distinguished guest speakers?
They really good ones still do it because the cardinal sin of sarging is "oneitis", meaning "she is the one and only" putting a single girl on a pedestal, the only way to prevent this emotionally this is polygamy, you can still love and respect individual women like you love a friend, but you never enter the danger zone, because after you enter here odds are higher that it can end in disaster, particularly if for some reason she views you differently.
I argue that it is healthier this way because you choose your permanent partner (but never only) based on logic and reasoning, not emotional slavery.
I don't advice it, but even the happily married should take a look particularly their theories on biological evolution, many may have been surprised at 50 shades, but I have known about women's darker desires for years. They yearn to be perfectly protected, they yearn the cave man/animal sex (it should be the only type of sex you practice and only do the kindness one for variety), it is just million of years of evolution that is just not going away any time soon. And they will never openly admit it.Anyway, you posit in your own post that only 1 in a 1000 women would go for an open marriage even under the best case scenario. Perhaps - and I'm just throwing this out there - maybe exploring the whole polygamy route would typically be a rather large misstep in a relationship, even for a man armed with the gifts of self-confidence and cheesy romance novels.
If nothing else, I think I finally understand your fascination with Kobe Bryant.they yearn the cave man/animal sex (it should be the only type of sex you practice and only do the kindness one for variety)
I'm betting a lot of shagsters practice nolygamy
I'm assuming he is a sock/troll but who cares. This is $#@!tard level crazy gold.
Can you explain this further? How does one "perfectly protect" and dominate a woman in Modern Society? While on the one hand your theories ring somewhat true from a biological perspective, society has changed this. This isn't 1000 years ago where some thrall woman in Finland wanted to be raped repeatedly by her master and bare his kids.
What say you?
Wow you people really are in a dark place if you think this is anywhere near rape, is the dude in 50 shades raping the girl? err no he clearly is indulging in her deepest sexual fantasies that society has forced them to repress.
Frankly I don't like BSDM, but having caveman sex is nothing more than grunting, having sex standing up against the wall, slapping her ass whenever you feel like it, pushing her with your outstreched fingers into the bed (show of strength without portraying anger), telling her to blow you.
Basically all the things macho she is supposedly trained to reject, but in the ABSOULTE safety of the bedroom meaning the protection she yearns. It is not that hard to spice things up, just go with your biological needs with just the simple societal caveat of no meaning no, and no exceptions.
For the record I have not read the book, I only know of it is from the summaries of other people.
Waterdog?
Home ..
Advertise ..
ShaggyShop ..
PanchoChat
Football ..
Basketball ..
Baseball ..
Other Sports ..
RC Didn't Offer ..
Gamboool
Varsity ..
Hole in the Wall ..
PCL ..
Einstein's ..
Nasty's ..
GM Steakhouse ..
NSAA
Bada Bing ..
Can you help me with this? ..
Shagslist ..
Cloak Room ..
Classics ..
Bellmont